The targeted biopsy concept
What 'targeted' means: cognitive, software fusion and in-bore, plus systematic sampling.
Once the MRI shows a lesion, the obvious question is: how do we actually get the needle into it? This module makes "targeted biopsy" feel simple.
The raw multi-parametric scan.
Segmented gland, zones and lesion as a rotatable model.
Future spatial-computing workflows for placing the anatomy model in clinical space.
01 Targeted vs systematic 4 min
Two ideas, often done together.
- Targeted: sample the specific lesion the MRI flagged.
- Systematic: take a standard template of cores across the whole gland, regardless of the MRI, to catch anything hiding.
A targeted biopsy samples what?
02 Three ways to hit the target 5 min
There are three ways to get the needle to an MRI lesion using ultrasound or the scanner.
- Cognitive fusion: the operator looks at the MRI, then aims on live ultrasound from memory. Cheap, quick, operator-dependent.
- Software fusion: the MRI is digitally overlaid onto the live ultrasound. More precise.
- In-bore: the biopsy is done inside the MRI scanner itself. Most accurate, most resource-heavy.
Which method overlays the MRI onto the live ultrasound image?
03 Mapping the lesion to the gland 4 min
To be reproducible, we divide the gland into sectors and record where the lesion and the cores are. For transperineal work the Ginsburg scheme is a common standard.
This is exactly where spatial reasoning matters, and where a 3D model beats a flat diagram.
Why divide the gland into sectors when biopsying?
04 Why combined is best 4 min
Targeted alone can miss significant cancer sitting outside the visible lesion. Systematic alone can miss the lesion's worst part. Doing both catches the most clinically significant disease, which is why combined biopsy is widely recommended.
What does adding systematic cores to a targeted biopsy achieve?
That is Module 4. You understand how the MRI lesion becomes a needle in the right place.
Next: Transrectal (TRUS) biopsy →